kerbz00 wrote:flamezter wrote:rockstar2001 wrote:since when is any exploit ethical...that has no bearing on whether it will work or not...don't have the extra holopets to test this so cant say either way myself though...

perhaps unethical was the wrong choice of words, how about waste of time?
the main point of a _working_ exploit is to gain benefit and get away with it, if your going to do something that someone can easily get back, and you will have done nothing but waste your own time.
yes it "works" that you can get the holo-pet back, but anyone who is willing to be buying a rare holo-pet is not going to forget where they put it 5 minutes after they bought it... therefore to me, its a nay, if it was 100% full proof i would say yay, but its
not even close to 50% which does not seem reasonable enough to me for this to be worth using or for anyone else to use.
How did you manage to get this figure? I've already stated it
worked for me and I kept my holopet (which was quite rare being a rancor holopet), I obtained my 60million credits for it, and the CSR gave the guy a rancor holopet (especially since I agreed that he did have a rancor holopet traded from me)....so how can you say that's not reasonable enough to be worth using? Secondly, my friend has also done this, not with a holopet quite as rare as the rancor (was only a peko peko holopet) and the same instance occured with CSR, and the same result came about. Seems worth it for me? And yes if too many of these instances occur with the CSR team then it will spark up a flag and they will look into it, so yes it's not 100% full proof, but saying that many of the other Confirmed Exploits are also raising flags even now.
Ok, well considering that not ALOT of people on my server don't have these rare pets (Ewok, Rancor,Peko-Peko Ect.) people would fall for this trick quite easily, BUT the problem is, is getting the pets for the scam. If you had the money to buy these holo-pets to resale (scam) it could profit in the LONG run, but you see the major problem with this scam is that not too many people who would need /want the money by scamming, could afford the 60-90 mil

So, unless you already have the data-cube this won't work THAT well

So, this has to be a /nay for me.