deamon wrote:-Someone distributes your work you have created. There is also a law somewhere out there that states that you have the right distribute some elses work as long as the owner is making a profit, or the distributer isnt making any profit from it. This is why Kazaa is up and running, because people can share p2p wise. This is also why people dont get sued for singing some elses song at chereoky night. Now if you take a girl that can sing well and you go and make her sing a britney spears song and you charge people for it, then you have your copyright TAULT CENSORED.
Sorry im just a bit drunk from today/yesturday or 2004/2005 yaaaaaaaaaaaaa go 2005!!!!!!!!!!!!! wooooooooooooooooooo
This is flat out false. You do not have the right to distribute someone else's intellectual property regardless of profit or loss. Kazaa is up and running b/c it is a facilitator, and kazaa itself is not distributing anything. It is still 100% illegal to share copyrighted files via kazaa, but impossible to police, which is why the movie and music industries are doing backflips to try to discourage it, with little success.
There ARE instances where you can reproduce and distribute intellectual property: Academia and Journalism. For instance, if I'm a teacher teaching a class (actually I AM a teacher), I can make copies of stuff for use in my class. If I'm writing a review in a magazine, I can use images or quotes.
The issue is the question of Blizz's terms of use. They are a private company running a game on a subscription basis. You agree to the terms when you sign up. If you don't like them, then don't play the game. If you try to get around them, don't be surprised if you get banned.