Are succubus(spelt wrong) any good? : World of Warcraft General Discussions

Tault_danceofthedead wrote:you all are saying it like you don't do it yourself. Tsk Tsk

Hah, now we know what YOU do danceofthedead in your free time.

hehe perverts

rabidsoccerball wrote:hehe perverts

lemme lay it down for you:

The Succubus is a welcome upgrade for you:

it has Medium Armor and Good Attack. It's armor is better than the Imp's(which is paper thin) but not good as the Voidwalker's(VW has the equivalent of Mail to Plate armor)

It's attack is good as well it makes up for your lack of STR(which indicates melee damage)

Soothing Kiss is useless IMHO it is an ANTI-TAUNT. Like it says in the description: when SK is used, the monster attacks ANOTHER TARGET! Meaning the succy loses aggro and theo nly other target would be you(in solo PVE) or possibly the tank)hopefuly, in groups)

as fir her tanking skills, she's ok but not as good as the VW's taunt(Torment) when the Succy loses aggro open fire on the mob. and have the succy attack from behind

viperstrike wrote:lemme lay it down for you:

The Succubus is a welcome upgrade for you:

it has Medium Armor and Good Attack. It's armor is better than the Imp's(which is paper thin) but not good as the Voidwalker's(VW has the equivalent of Mail to Plate armor)

It's attack is good as well it makes up for your lack of STR(which indicates melee damage)

Soothing Kiss is useless IMHO it is an ANTI-TAUNT. Like it says in the description: when SK is used, the monster attacks ANOTHER TARGET! Meaning the succy loses aggro and theo nly other target would be you(in solo PVE) or possibly the tank)hopefuly, in groups)

as fir her tanking skills, she's ok but not as good as the VW's taunt(Torment) when the Succy loses aggro open fire on the mob. and have the succy attack from behind

lots of info ty