|
TU Chat |
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Max Levels : GW Discussion - Page 3
 |
kallick |
July 20th, 2006, 11:33 pm |
|
Cash on hand: Locked
|
They do already, have you played the game to the end?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
sporkrocker |
July 21st, 2006, 11:33 am |
|
Cash on hand: Locked
|
Urgoz, The Deep, Titan Quest, Sorrow's Furnace, and etc
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
ill_tell_my |
August 4th, 2006, 4:40 am |
|
Cash on hand: Locked
|
sleekightslayer (!empty($user->lang['WROTE'])) ? $user->lang['WROTE'] : ucwords(strtolower(str_replace('_', ' ', 'WROTE'))): Yes and No. If they balanced the characters out better yes and if they had it like they do then yes.
so what do u mean by no, no if they didnt balnce the charcters.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
durran992 |
August 7th, 2006, 7:15 pm |
|
Cash on hand: Locked
|
i dont like it thats it sooo easyto get to lvl 20 or i would rather have more levels or harder to get to lvl 20
In factions i got to lvl 20 in 3-4 hours
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
thetruepwner |
August 18th, 2006, 2:59 pm |
|
Cash on hand: Locked
|
Well i have no problem with the level 20 cap in fact i like it better then the other MMOs. I came to Guild Wars fact that it is about skill rather while in CoH and CoV it was just a long race to reach level 50 my first had taken me friggen 2 months. But yeah leave it how it is
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
doomfrost |
August 18th, 2006, 7:25 pm |
|
Cash on hand: Locked
|
Here's the problem. You increase the level cap, you also have to increase the limit of how much a attribute can hold, also increase the damage of weapons, and add enemies with higher levels than the player.
Example
Increase to level 40.
Health would be 880 at the end.
Max points per attribute would be 24.
And the maximum attribute points would be 400.
Max weapon damage would have to increased as well.
Oh sure this is great for hardcore PvE players, but think about PvP.
I mean you could say, "Well if they want to get to level 40 just create a custom build PvP player and they're all set." But we all know that when we go into PvP we see PvE players with cool armor and weapon skins.
Believe me I like higher levels. But Anet wants the player base to get into PvP play as quick as possible, and if you're not into PvP then they try to give as much PvE content as they can.
I'd like the idea to have higher levels, but I at level 40 would just be doing the same percentage of damage if I were level 20.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
trekkie9 |
August 20th, 2006, 5:55 am |
|
Cash on hand: Locked
|
If the lvl wasn't capped at 20 it would be harder for new characters to get into the game. It could end like lineage2 with high lvls slaughtering noobs for fun.(they might have fixed this, been a while since i played)
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
memsia of fire |
September 3rd, 2006, 10:11 pm |
|
Cash on hand: Locked
|
it would be cool to have the max to like lvl 35 or somethign so they would put more effort in the game
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
kallick |
September 4th, 2006, 9:56 am |
|
Cash on hand: Locked
|
The map should be runnable. I loved exploring Tyria and finding new places (and being allowed in regardless)
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
bitbadge |
September 5th, 2006, 10:49 am |
|
Cash on hand: Locked
|
a higher level would make people want to play the game more but then the creators of hte game would have to make more content for just about everything
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
skizzikthegreat |
October 3rd, 2006, 1:06 pm |
|
Cash on hand: Locked
|
i do like how it makes this game more of a teamwork game, but i do enjoy the leveling up in RPGs, would be cool if they made more server choices for people who prefer different gameplay types
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
|
|