Patch 3.2 PTR Tier 9 reawakens faction pride and... homogeneity?![(!empty($user->lang['IMAGE'])) ? $user->lang['IMAGE'] : ucwords(strtolower(str_replace('_', ' ', 'IMAGE')))](http://www.blogcdn.com/www.wow.com/media/2009/06/zach-tier-9-homogenous.jpg)
When Blizzard announced that the new
Tier 9 sets with
Patch 3.2 would be faction-specific, I'm sure I wasn't the only one who thought how awesome that would be. It would mark the first time tier sets would be themed to a faction. It was something many players had been asking for. But as the saying goes,
"be careful what you wish for..." In this case, players such as myself are actually going to see the return of faction-specific armor except that there's one niggling detail we'd forgotten about the first faction-specific gear sets (
Level 60 PvP) -- they were armor class-based.
That's right. As wonderful as many players thought those faction-specific armor sets were, they were actually somewhat homogenous in that classes that shared the same armor type (i.e., cloth, leather, plate) had the same models. Apparently this is Blizzard's philosophy with armor set design: either the class sets are faction-neutral but look distinct from each other or they are faction-specific but look the same across armor class. The only time Blizzard broke from tradition was with the much-maligned Sunwell Plateau gear which was both faction-neutral
and shared a look across armor class. It felt lazy.
Continue reading Patch 3.2 PTR Tier 9 reawakens faction pride and... homogeneity?Filed under:
Patches,
Items,
Analysis / OpinionPatch 3.2 PTR Tier 9 reawakens faction pride and... homogeneity? originally appeared on
WoW.com on Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:00:00 EST. Please see our
terms for use of feeds.
Read |
Permalink |
Email this |
CommentsAuthor: SUPPORT@WEBLOGSINC.COM (Zach Yonzon)
Category: Argent-TournamentCrusaders-ColiseumMMO-Championpatch-3.2patch-3.2-changespatch-3.2-wowTier-9world-of-warcraft-patch-3.2wow-3.2-changeswow-new-patchwow-patchwow-patch-3.2wow-patch-news
Publish Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:00:00 EST
Read more...